Auxiliary Material for Paper 2005JB003891 Uplift and subsidence associated with the great Aceh-Andaman earthquake of 2004 Aron J. Meltzner and Kerry Sieh Tectonics Observatory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Michael Abrams Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Duncan C. Agnew Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Kenneth W. Hudnut U.S. Geological Survey, Pasadena, California, USA Jean-Philippe Avouac Tectonics Observatory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Danny H. Natawidjaja Research Center for Geotechnology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia Meltzner, A. J., K. Sieh, M. Abrams, D. C. Agnew, K. W. Hudnut, J.-P. Avouac, and D. H. Natawidjaja (2006), Uplift and subsidence associated with the great Aceh-Andaman earthquake of 2004, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B02407, doi:10.1029/2005JB003891. Introduction This electronic supplement consists of three tables that collectively constitute our data. Table S1, "2005JB003891-ts01.txt", lists the constraints on vertical deformation that can be made from satellite imagery and the tidal model. Table S2, "2005JB003891-ts02.txt", lists the estimates of vertical deformation on Simeulue that can be made from field observations in 2005, using uplifted coral microatolls in conjunction with the tidal model. Table S3, "2005JB003891-ts03.txt", lists less quantitative information on coseismic subsidence on Simeulue, for two locations. Only some of the data listed in Tables S1-S3 are shown in map view on Fig. 5, whereas Tables S1-S3, collectively, are comprehensive. 1. 2005JB003891-ts01.txt Vertical changes determined from satellite imagery. 1.1 Column "Latitude", degrees, latitude of the observation point, north of Equator. 1.2 Column "Longitude", degrees, longitude of the observation point, east of Greenwich. 1.3 Column "MinDeltaZ", minimum uplift (if positive) or maximum subsidence (if negative), in cm; "null" indicates that a given datum does not provide such constraint. 1.4 Column "MaxDeltaZ", maximum uplift (if positive) or minimum subsidence (if negative), in cm; "null" indicates that a given datum does not provide such constraint. 1.5 Column "2sigma", CONSERVATIVE (see text) 2-sigma uncertainty associated with both the minimum and maximum elevation changes, in cm. When stated as ± 14 cm, it is the uncertainty associated with the tidal model. When the uncertainty is listed as "0", the observation for that point is of submergence, i.e., of water connected to the ocean in a location where it would never have been previously; for these observations (all of which are in Aceh), the tidal model was not used. 1.6 Column "PreDate", acquisition date (yyyy/mm/dd, UTC) of the pre-earthquake image used for the final calculation of elevation change (additional pre-earthquake images may have been viewed for the study). 1.7 Column "PostDate", acquisition date (yyyy/mm/dd, UTC) of the post-earthquake image used for the final calculation of elevation change (additional post-earthquake images may have been viewed for the study). 1.8 Column "PreType", type of imagery of the pre-earthquake image used for the final calculation of elevation change (A: ASTER; I: IKONOS; Q: QuickBird; S: SPOT). 1.9 Column "PostType", type of imagery of the post-earthquake image used for the final calculation of elevation change (A: ASTER; I: IKONOS; Q: QuickBird; S: SPOT). Points for which a minimum constraint on uplift or a minimum constraint on subsidence was determined are shown in map view on Fig. 5. The following discussion might be useful for understanding Table S1: a) If there is a positive number, say X, in column "MinDeltaZ", then any {uplift} greater than X is allowed. b) If there is a negative number X in column "MinDeltaZ", then any {uplift} greater than X is allowed [this includes subsidence for which the absolute value of {elevation change} is less than abs(X), e.g., if X = -20 then 10 cm of subsidence is allowed; zero change or any positive uplift value would also be allowed]. c) If there is a number in column "MaxDeltaZ", call it Y, in addition to X in column "MinDeltaZ", then X < {elevation change} < Y. d) If there is only a column "MaxDeltaZ" entry (only Y, no X) then {elevation change} < Y. 2. 2005JB003891-ts02.txt Uplift on Simeulue determined from field measurements of coral microatolls. 2.1 Column "Latitude", degrees, latitude of the observation point, north of Equator. 2.2 Column "Longitude", degrees, longitude of the observation point, east of Greenwich. 2.3 Column "DeltaZ", uplift, in cm (none of these measurements were of subsidence). 2.4 Column "2sigma", estimated 2-sigma uncertainty associated with the calculation, in cm; sources of uncertainty include imprecision in the coral record, in the measurement technique, and in the tidal model. 2.5 Column "Date", date of measurement (yyyy/mm/dd). These points are shown in map view on Fig. 5. 3. 2005JB003891-ts03.txt Subsidence on Simeulue determined from field observations. 3.1 Column "Latitude", degrees, latitude of the observation point, north of Equator. 3.2 Column "Longitude", degrees, longitude of the observation point, east of Greenwich. 3.3 Column "DeltaZ", change in elevation, in cm. (In Salur, we measured the depth of flooding of a well-drained locality where residents said water had never stood before, which effectively provides a minimum constraint on subsidence there; the uncertainty on this minimum constraint is difficult to assess. In Busung, Gusong Bay, there is a rough estimate of subsidence from R. Peters, http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/news/reportsleg1.html; no estimate of the uncertainty is available for this point, but it may be considerable.) 3.4 Column "Date", date of observation (yyyy/mm/dd). 3.5 Column "Location", name of location. 3.6 Column "Note", note on whether the value given in column "DeltaZ" is an estimate or a one-sided (minimum or maximum) constraint of the elevation change. These points are shown in map view on Fig. 5.